




17
This has been coming down the pipes for awhile: Senate Bill 374, which would require trainers to have either a 4-yr degree in a health/fitness-related field, such as kinesiology or exercise physiology, or certification from an accredited organization (currently, only 10 of the more than 200 certifying agencies in the U.S. are accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA): ACE, NSCA, ACSM, NASM, and ISSA, to name a few. The bill has both good and bad points. Over the past several years, the bill has picked up steam and comments between trainers have been mixed. Some argue that the bill will help weed out trainers who acquire certification in one short weekend, and who have no practical experience or the broad depth of knowledge required to design safe, effective programs. Others point out that the additional educational requirements and certification will be quite costly to trainers who will have to go back to school, etc. Industry experts argue the that the fitness industry has regulated itself quite nicely, thank you very much. You can read an article related to this topic just published in the Ventura County Star.
I would love to hear your thoughts on this issue…what do you think – tougher standards across the board, or leave it alone?